The UN climate summits show a world where the nuances between should, must and will, can prove decisive for the outcome of negotiations.
THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD
In 1989 Bill McKibben published The End of Nature, and with it a powerful message to the effect that humanity’s destructive impact on the earth’s biosphere was about to reach a point of no return. The mechanisms of climate change that were about to set in would change both nature and our conditions for life forever.
For at least 30 years we’ve known what we’re up against, a fact most people who’ll take the time to watch the documentary Guardians of the Earth know all too well. The film starts by showing Donald Trump responding to a journalist’s question concerning what he’ll do about climate change. Rather than answer, Trump goes on to attack his predecessor. Obama’s statement that global warming poses the most serious problem of our time is, Trump says, the most stupid claim that has ever been made.
Time Is Running Out
We should be grateful that the world doesn’t pay much attention to Trump on this question. The systematic process that for the past three decades has tried to implement more effective climate measures internationally is still moving forward, and much seems to indicate that it’s become a self-reinforcing mechanism. Here many would argue that the process is far too slow, but nevertheless this development is proof of a widely held determination to do something constructive about climate change. The arena where this resolve is put to the test is the UN’s annual climate summit.
«It’s usually in personal conversations – “informal meetings” – that real progress towards good solutions is made.»
After many years of disappointing results, the Paris talks in the autumn of 2015 led to an important breakthrough. Guardians of the Earth provides an interesting look at the teeming anthill of people who met in the French capital. Through a mix of short interviews and footage of the long series of meetings and negotiations, we follow an occasionally powerful engagement. It’s stated as a matter of fact that climate change is happening and that we’re running out of time. It’s similarly highlighted that the goal of keeping the global rise of temperatures to below 2 degrees Celsius isn’t enough. The world will have to achieve 1.5 degrees, above all because of the world’s poor.
An International Framework
Login to continue...You have now read 4 free articles this month, so log in if you are a subscriber,
or please click here for subscription (3 euro/month) to read all articles.