The above is especially true with regard to a documentary such as the evolving work-inprogress documentary Loose Change (2005-2009), an internet blockbuster seen by around 100 million people, where the director argues the case that explosives were planted in the World Trade Centre and that the American air force was too busy with war
games to react properly to the attacks.

«Her former employer knew disturbingly much about the terror attacks in advance»

Another documentary with a perhaps equally daring hypothesis is 9/11 Press for Truth (2006), which has been screened on television channels all over the world. It centres on four widows who lost their husbands in the terror attacks and who, during their research, become convinced that the US Government let the terrorists slip through US security barriers all too easily. Both documentaries carry within them a rare and necessary sceptical outlook on the events that took place on 9/11, 2001. During the ten years that have passed, we have seen other documentaries giving insights into a movement of 9/11-sceptics growing in numbers in the backwaters of the war on terror. One such documentary is Zero – An Investigation into 9/11 (2008) in which Nobel Laureate, Dario Fo, expresses his doubts about what actually happened; and in the documentary, The
The Elephant in the Room (2008), by Dean Puckett, we witness the impact similar doubts have made on a young generation of Britons – in the film we are also confronted with new information about lapses in the security system of the World Trade Centre in the days preceding the terror attacks, information which will probably stay unconfirmed for the foreseeable future.

Login or signup to read the rest..

If you do not have subscription, you can just login or register, and choose free guest or subscription to read all articles.

 


-

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here