After his feature documentary Into the Abyss, about the murder of Sandra Stotler, her husband Adam, and their friend Jeremy Richardson, and the capital punishment the perpetrators were sentenced to – German filmmaker Werner Herzog presents four separate portraits of individuals sentenced to death in the United States. Contrary to other “death row docs” in which filmmakers try to elicit sympathy or understanding for inmates or take up the cause of the wrongfully convicted, Herzog reconstructs the tragic events by confronting the inmates.1
Herzog has a characteristic way of presenting himself in his films. In his 2005 Grizzly Man, Herzog, on screen, listens via headphones to the audio (the cap was still on the lens) of the videotapes that captured the Grizzly attack on Treadwell and his girlfriend Huguenard. He advises Jewel Palovak, ex partner of Treadwell, not to do the same, as it is supposedly quite gruesome. We as viewers also have to do without it. In this scene Herzog explicitly positions himself as interlocutor, mediating between the profilmic and the audience.
In Death Row, Herzog is visually as good as absent, but orally he is very present, as interlocutor, but also as prosecutor, judge, and outsider. His role as interlocutor between the story and its protagonists and the viewer, surfaces when he tells one of the interviewees, Hank Skinner, that although he disagrees with the sentence, the film will not be an instrument in proving Skinner’s innocence. Skinner’s response: “Oh I know, he already told me”, pointing to someone next to the camera. At the end of the episode, over a desolate landscape, Herzog relates to the viewer: “Inspired by Hank Skinner, we took this trip for ourselves … everything out there all of a sudden looked magnificent, as if entering the holy land. Hank Skinner’s holy land.” In the first instance, the production of the film and the information about the intentions of its maker come to light – conveyed for the viewer this time rather than for the participant. In the second, Herzog mediates – not just visually but also orally – the account of a landscape now inaccessible for Skinner but also for the viewer.
Barnes landed in prison after murdering a young woman. Herzog interrupts him: “It’s very fascinating for me because you refuse to speak about it. Apparently you had one or two, uhm, several encounters with your victim, with Patricia Miller whom you killed. You never talked about it and refuse to talk about it, but apparently you were humiliated or repudiated by her. I do now know. Uhm…” Herzog again and again displays his knowledge of the details of the cases while here claiming ignorance. The silence that follows can only be an invitation to Barnes to speak, an invocation to fill in the gaps.
Login or signup to read the rest..If you do not have subscription, you can just login or register, and choose free guest or subscription to read all articles.