Carmen is a freelance film critic and regular contributor to Modern Times Review.

John Pilger’s documentary predicts a horrifying possibility: that China and the US are on the brink of war.

The coming war on China

John Pilger

UK 2016 113 minutes

Veteran journalist and war correspondent John Pilger has long been an outspoken critic of US foreign policy and its perceived imperialist agenda. He is a prolific television documentarian, and since 2007’s The War on Democracy, an indictment of intervention in Latin America, his films have also been released in cinemas. His latest feature The Coming War on China focuses on the so-called “pivot” to East Asia, America’s shift in attention toward increased involvement in the Pacific, and the notion that this is part of a policy to hem China in as a means to continue US hegemony in the region.

Giant Noose

Pilger’s approach has always been one of firebrand partisanship which holds that there are not so much two sides of a story to be investigated with balance, but a truth to be revealed to redress a dissembler’s version that has too long held sway through western media bias. True to form, there is no pretense of cold distance in The Coming War on China. Pilger glosses over nuanced complexity in favour of an overarching narrative of empire, enacted through a “giant noose” of military bases, coupled with a propaganda push priming the world to regard China as the new enemy. He is front and centre as interviewer and authoritative narrator–at times sardonic and at others hyperbolic and emotive. But this is no superficial grandstanding exercise. A thoughtfully chosen, impressive array of talking heads (including locals sought beyond the spheres of policy and academia) powerfully challenge dominant cultural clichés about East Asian nations and offer first-hand accounts of the pain of the colonised, reinforcing the validity of Pilger’s claims.

Pilger advances his argument through delineated sections, the first–and most rousingly damning–of which sets out America’s long history of human rights abuses and oppression in the Pacific. Archival footage portrays the Marshall Islands as a tropical paradise before it was occupied by the US in World War II and used for testing nuclear weapons. Inhabitants (described in US footage from the time as “happy savages”) became guinea pigs, taken to Chicago and studied for radiation exposure before being sent back to a contaminated home. Many died of cancer, their irradiated forms a far cry from the “bikini” bodies that were the new rage in the West–the swimsuit having been named after the nuclear test atoll further illustrating the West’s callous hypocrisy which is underscored time and again in the film. It’s impossible not to agree with the “apartheid” label Pilger uses for the gulf in living standards brought on by the American presence, as locals of Ebeye Island, now known as the “slum of the Pacific”, are ferried across the bay to work, tending the golf course at a Reagan-era missile site: “A wonderland of suburban good life.”

«Pilger advances his argument through delineated sections, the first of which sets out America’s long history of human rights abuses and oppression in the Pacific.»


Threatening the West’s position of arrogant domination is the renewed fear of a rising China–a nation free from foreign bases upon its territory–with a new outspoken and political class, which is to some degree separate from its vibrant market economy. The film shows that this fear has a long historical precedent, upheld by propagandistic caricatures of the Chinese (we see Boris Karloff in a ‘30s incarnation of evil-genius criminal Fu Manchu, an English invention), which concealed another imperial agenda: opium money, used to build the first US industrial city.

You have to login or create account (top menu) to read on for a while. Or get full access, print magazines and your own presentation page as a member.

Facebook Comments