Sundance is now in its 29th year. There’s more corporate sponsorship than in the old days and tons more swag. But amidst the celebrity gifting suites, something remains the same – the commitment to independent voices, especially in the documentary programme which continues to take on critical global, ecological, and humanitarian concerns.

A cluster of documentaries this year addressed timely United States political and economic issues. I will focus on three: The World According to Dick Cheney by R.J. Cutler and Greg Finton, Inequality for All by Jacob Kornbluth, and 99% – The Occupy Wall Street Collaborative Film, which lists nine co-directors and nearly 100 collaborators behind founders Audrey Ewell and Aaron Aites.

R.J. Cutler, co-director of The World According to Dick Cheney, was last at Sundance with The September Issue, about fashion magazine Vogue. Several colleagues wondered if an overtly political filmmaker would have been given the same access Cutler had to the man who wielded unprecedented power as Vice President under George W. Bush. Cutler had four days of sit-down time with Cheney, and the doc is built around the interview.

Dick Cheney, then vice president, leading a meeting of top Bush administration officials immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks.

For people who don’t know who Cheney is, or don’t know that it was Cheney (not President Bush) at the helm after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, or didn’t know that a Vice President could be so set on taking the United States to war, you might learn something. For those who are exasperated this man who swore to defend the Constitution held such seeming disregard for the separation of powers, and the Justice Department, and the Geneva Conventions, you may become frustrated and even outraged.

One audience member walked out during a post-screening Q&A after challenging the filmmakers about how they let Cheney off the hook, not even pressing any follow-up questions when the former Vice President, the audience member said, ought to be standing trial for treason. At least he ought to have to answer to the financial troubles the U.S. finds itself in due to the enormous cost of wars that continue to drag us down.

R.J. Cutler

But, that’s just an opinion. Cheney defends his convictions without pause, from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to waterboarding and warrantless wiretapping. Cheney’s talking head interviews are balanced by experts who offer counterpoint, but nothing terribly radical. And Cutler throws softballs to Cheney, never digging up any dirt, especially regarding Halliburton (the contractor Cheney has ties to), an omission which leaves an indelible mark on the film. After accusations in the public sphere that Cheney profits from the war, the filmmakers don’t even raise the question, if even to offer an opportunity for refutation. For this and other significant absences, I am left concerned someone might treat this film as a pedagogic document.

… a depth of heart rarely found in a film about economics

Login to continue...

You have now read 4 free articles this month, so log in if you are a subscriber,
or please click here for subscription (3 euro/month) to read all articles.


-

Why not leave a reply?