Although the countries of the former Eastern Bloc share a history of state intervention and subversive cultural practices, cinephiles often regard them in pairs: Romanian traditions are closer to Bulgarian, than to Czechoslovakian or Polish cinematic tradition, while filmmakers from the latter made film history with strong film “waves” during the 1960s and 1970s; the former were united by their inability to sustain an international profile, partially due to the country’s more repressive and controlling political regimes.
The 1990s saw a prolonged crisis of this practice and eventually the collapse of the studio which had epitomised doc production in Romania for almost five decades. Beyond the crumbling institutional infrastructure and the general economic meltdown, the “death of doc” was also a sort of “death by memory”: too strongly associated in the collective memory with the propaganda of the previous regime, documentary suffered from a poor public image and had to be put aside for some time, as both professionals and audiences needed to disassociate themselves from the past. It was not until the early 2000s that the film community was able to re-engage with a genre that only recently had involved political complicity.
New Funding Spurs Doc Developments
Don’t Get Me Wrong / Nu te supăra, dar… by Adina Pintilie (2006, Romania)
Romanian documentary got on the fast track in 2004 when four films were selected in competition at IDFA and one won the First Appearance Award. The recent Golden Dove awarded in Leipzig to young Adina Pintilie (Don’t Get Me Wrong) has been another significant success, but documentary filmmakers are still not internationally perceived as part of the New Romanian Cinema.
2007 brought a number of significant additions to the domestic scene. Firstly, following on the heels of Romania’s accession to the EU, domestic projects have become eligible for Pre-media support, with three documentaries receiving development funding. Media Desk has also arrived in Romania, and four Romanian production companies recently received financing under the Single Project support scheme.
While Romania’s main film institutions are based in Bucharest, two of the most significant pro-documentary initiatives are based in Sibiu and Timisoara respectively. Chronologically, the first to be mentioned is Sibiu’s ASTRA Film Festival [http://www.astrafilm.ro], the main institution responsible for bringing a steady diet of intelligent and creative documentaries to Romanian audiences since the mid 1990s.
The newest addition to the local doc scene is DocuMentor, the first association of Romanian documentary professionals, whose inaugural event was joining forces with the Discovery Campus Masterschool (DCM) to host Go East: at the Crossroads of International Co-productions’, the DCM’s open session in Timisoara in September.
Go East was preceded by a special two-day session made possible by Pre-Media and targeting domestic professionals, as a mild acknowledgement of the ‘differences in temperature’ between the domestic and the wider international doc culture. Many of the participants were film students rather than the emerging independent producers or commissioning editors initially targeted. The domestic participation in DCM’s open session was also unsubstantial: delegates from Discovery Channel, The Sundance Institute, Channel4, ARTE, ZDF, ORF, HBO were joined by only two commissioning editors from Romania.
Steady Improvement at the National Film Centre
The mechanism of state support for Romanian filmmakers has improved over the recent years. After years of tension between filmmakers and the institutions of the film industry, the financing contest run by Romania’s National Film Centre (CNC) has become a regular biannual occurrence. Each session runs a contest for fiction and one for documentary/animation respectively, the separation of the two being another recent addition to the system, which only became possible after extensive lobbying.
The number of doc projects submitted for funding increased from 34 in 2006 to 51 over the summer/autumn session 2007. The most dramatic increase, pointing to a significant change in perspective, occurred in the feature-length documentary category, which more than doubled, i.e. from 8 to 19 projects. The figures need to be seen in context: for decades, Romania knew only the short-length doc, as another legacy of a socialist distribution system that classified documentary film exclusively as supporting film to a ‘main’ fiction film. It took years of effort (and not least a boost of confidence obtained by Iepan & Solomon from DCM in the early 2000s) to introduce the feature-length documentary as a distinct category for financing under the new CNC regulations.
Login or signup to read the rest..If you do not have subscription, you can just login or register, and choose free guest or subscription to read all articles.