While randomly browsing YouTube videos I came across a few scenes that attracted my attention. The video screen was divided in two. On the left hand side was black and white footage of a film camera moving in front of a brick wall. The footage was created using stop motion and the scene was contrasted with close-up images of a woman smiling in a movie theatre. On the right hand side were colour images of a moving film camera in front of a brick wall, and on top of a roof filming an urban landscape with skyscrapers in a slowly moving travelling shot. It seemed familiar to me and yet something was different. I had the feeling of having seen these scenes before but in a different way and context. What I saw was a scene from Perry Bard’s participatory video project Man With a Movie Camera: The Global Remake.1 And yes, indeed the film is a remake of Dziga Vertov’s thought-provoking The Man with a Movie Camera released in 1929. There’s nothing new about remakes. They go back as long as movie history itself. The essential newness regarding Bard’s project has to do with digital culture. It has to do with production methods, screening habits as well as content and style. Bard’s project is an example of how digital culture can transform and recreate the film as medium.
Two characteristics come to mind when considering the production and distribution of Bard’s project as opposed to Vertov’s film: openness and the participatory element based on the crowdsourcing method. If we first look at the mode of production, Vertov’s film can be said to have a rather traditional documentary setup involving a small film crew. Vertov is the artist behind the film. Even though he calls the film an experiment, he is branded as the auteur of the film. Bard’s project is very different considering the mode of production and the idea of the artist behind the work. On the project’s website Vertov’s film is broken down into small pieces and the user can browse a shot list crossreferenced by subject and scene. The user can then choose which scene(s) he/she wants to recreate and afterwards use the online form to upload. The software is open source and the entire process of uploading shots and images is in the hands of the individual creator. Perry Bard does not execute any curatorial power over whether or not an uploaded piece can be considered appropriate or whether it is placed correctly in regards to the original shot. The software itself archives, sequences and streams the submissions as a film. As people can upload the same shot more than once and create shots that have already been created by others, infinite versions of the film are possible. If we extend the thinking around the participatory element with Tatiana Bazzichelli’s work on networking practices, we get a deeper understanding of the new form of artist concept. Bazzichelli connects the art of networking and collaborative art practices to the punk concept: “Punk culture refers to the idea of the death of art in order to open up creative possibilities for everyone. Anyone can play, as long as there is the desire to do it.”2